Sqlite 3.13 With Icu For Mac
After hours of googleing, i've decided to write my problem here: I simply wanna use the SQLite library in PHP. But i am getting this error here: Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function sqliteopen Then I have followed this instructions here: but then I recognized that.dll extensions are not compatible with Linux Distributions or MAC OSX Systems. Then I have found this here: and i have tried this here: - intalling MacPorts - $ sudo port install php5-sqlite - $ sudo port uninstall php5 - $ sudo port install php5 +apache2 +sqlite without success. So what i have found out is that sqlite is already installed in OSX High Sierra, but PHP could not find my sqlite distribution for some reason and additionaly really strange is that my phpinf gives me this here But why then my sqliteopen functions was not found?
SQLite viewer for Mac OS X. Up vote 4 down vote favorite. I need to inspect an SQLite file on Mac. What viewer should I use? Requirements: Free, ideally open source; Browse schema, data. Run queries; Bonus if updated in near real time when the file is modified by an external program, no need to click 'Refresh'. Ok, that could be the problem. The very latest (from two months ago or so) Anaconda Qt builds only support macOS 10.9 or higher. So you should roll back to a previous Qt build to see if that fixes this.
I am really confused, becasue the function is not deprecated. Please could anyone give me a lil hint here. Thank you so much!
Greets EDIT: i am using the 7.17 PHP Version.
On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: sqlite3 is rejecting a SELECT statement that includes the groupconcat function saying it's an unknown function, yet the same SELECT statement works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension. The version of sqlite3 on my Mac is 3.4.0 but it looks like the latest version is 3.6.x.
Jan 15, 2017 - -rw-r--r--, dev-db/sqlite/sqlite-3.13.0.ebuild, 2. ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~m68k-mint ~sparc-solaris.
Could that be the cause of the problem and if sowhere can I get that version (already compiled) for the Mac? From here: sqlite-users mailing list.
On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: sqlite3 is rejecting a SELECT statement that includes the groupconcat function saying it's an unknown function, yet the same SELECT statement works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension. The version of sqlite3 on my Mac is 3.4.0 but it looks like the latest version is 3.6.x. Could that be the cause of the problem and if sowhere can I get that version (already compiled) for the Mac? From here: The only pre-compiled OS X binary up there is the analyzer. Kreibich 'Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor.' 'I'll go home and see if I can scrounge up a ruler and a piece of string.'
-from Anathem by Neal Stephenson sqlite-users mailing list. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:23:18AM +0700, Dan Kennedy scratched on the wall: On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: sqlite3 is rejecting a SELECT statement that includes the groupconcat function saying it's an unknown function, yet the same SELECT statement works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension. The version of sqlite3 on my Mac is 3.4.0 but it looks like the latest version is 3.6.x.
Could that be the cause of the problem and if sowhere can I get that version (already compiled) for the Mac? From here: The only pre-compiled OS X binary up there is the analyzer.
True statement. sqlite-users mailing list. sqlite3 is rejecting a SELECT statement that includes the groupconcat function saying it's an unknown function, yet the same SELECT statement works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension.
The version of sqlite3 on my Mac is 3.4.0 but it looks like the latest version is 3.6.x. Could that be the cause of the problem and if sowhere can I get that version (already compiled) for the Mac? ThanksPete Haworth - William Kyngesburye Theory of the Universe There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable.
Sqlite 3.13 With Icu For Mac Os
There is another theory which states that this has already happened.Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy 2nd season intro sqlite-users mailing list. Yes, the analyzer is the only precompiled binary I see on the sqlite download page The groupconcat function works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension on the same Mac where it fails within sqlite3. Also, the development software I'm using (Revolution) also rejects the groupconcat function. I would have thought that the sqlite code would have been in a central library somewhere on my machine for any programs that make calls to it, but based on the above, it seems that each program has it's own private sqlite library of sqlite calls? Pete Haworth sqlite-users mailing list. Yes, the analyzer is the only precompiled binary I see on the sqlite download page The groupconcat function works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension on the same Mac where it fails within sqlite3. Also, the development software I'm using (Revolution) also rejects the groupconcat function.
I would have thought that the sqlite code would have been in a central library somewhere on my machine for any programs that make calls to it, but based on the above, it seems that each program has it's own private sqlite library of sqlite calls? That is the whole idea behind sqlite. You embed it in your program, and your program gets its own private db server, client, magic. Installing sqlite on Mac OS X is extremely easy, but you do have to have the free Xcode/developer tools installed (on your OS CD, or freely downloadable from Apple's website). Download the source, untar/gzip it, then sqlite-src./configure sqlite-src make sqlite-src sudo make install that above commands will build sqlite and put it in the 'central' place that you desire, that is, under /usr/local/ and then you can use them from anywhere. Of course, programs that have their own built in sqlite will continue to function with those built in versions until they are individually updated. Pete Haworth sqlite-users mailing list - Puneet Kishor Carbon Model Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation Science Commons Fellow, Nelson Institute, UW-Madison - Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States sqlite-users mailing list.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:04:23AM -0800, Peter Haworth scratched on the wall: The groupconcat function works fine in the Firefox SQLite Manager extension on the same Mac where it fails within sqlite3. Also, the development software I'm using (Revolution) also rejects the groupconcat function. I would have thought that the sqlite code would have been in a central library somewhere on my machine for any programs that make calls to it, but based on the above, it seems that each program has it's own private sqlite library of sqlite calls? Mac OS X includes a system-wide dynamic (shared) library in /usr/lib. That is also used by the CoreData framework and a few other Apple tools. The included /usr/bin/sqlite3 command line tool dynamically links against the /usr/lib library as well.
Most applications (such as Firefox) just compile the SQLite code directly into the application. This is considered the preferred way use SQLite in a larger application where the user never directly interacts with the database. Clearly that's not the case when using the Firefox SQLite Manager, but that's not exactly the normal way of using Firefox. Revolution may be using the system library, or it may just have an older, internal version. You can run the SQL query 'SELECT sqliteversion' to see what code a specific environment is using.
Sqlite 3.13 With Icu For Mac
As others have pointed out, it is extremely easy to build a new version of the SQLite libs and command line tool if you have the XCode tools installed. The download is a bit big, but they're useful to have around, even if you're not writing a lot of code. The only gotcha is that you want to be sure to install things into /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/lib. Since the /usr/lib stuff is used by some pretty core system OS stuff, I'd leave that alone and just install the newer copy elsewhere.
If you use Terminal for a lot of command line work, make sure your PATH is setup to use the correct binary/library. No use installing a new one if you keep using the old one. Kreibich 'Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs.
We have a protractor.' 'I'll go home and see if I can scrounge up a ruler and a piece of string.'
-from Anathem by Neal Stephenson sqlite-users mailing list. Thanks for all the info. I believe the problem lies within Revolution since I'm pretty sure it includes its own private library of the sqlite code. I've reported it to them and hopefully they will fix it.
I understand the reasons for applications having their own copy of the code like this but think there's equally good reasons why they should use a common library installed on the computer, maybe as an option. Right now, I have to rely on Revolution updating their code to solve my problems whereas with a common library approach, I could download and compile as several people have suggested and not have to rely on Revolution. Pete Haworth sqlite-users mailing list.
Thanks for all the info. I believe the problem lies within Revolution since I'm pretty sure it includes its own private library of the sqlite code. I've reported it to them and hopefully they will fix it. I understand the reasons for applications having their own copy of the code like this but think there's equally good reasons why they should use a common library installed on the computer, maybe as an option.
Right now, I have to rely on Revolution updating their code to solve my problems whereas with a common library approach, I could download and compile as several people have suggested and not have to rely on Revolution. I'd say this depends on the type of application: if an application uses sqlite for it's internal data management, but none of the SQL functionality is exposed to the user, then there are good reasons to include a private copy: the app might rely on certain features not available in older sqlite distributions which may exist on the deployment systems, or it might even have added some extension to sqlite which it relies on, etc. However, for applications that expose the SQL functionality (like php, perl modules, Revolution, SQL editors, etc.), it does make sense to use a shared library, which allows the user to update the SQLite implementation without having to wait for an application update. As usually: 'it depends.' ;-) my €.02sqlite-users mailing list. Am um 20:08 schrieb Peter Haworth: Thanks for all the info. I believe the problem lies within Revolution since I'm pretty sure it includes its own private library of the sqlite code.
I've reported it to them and hopefully they will fix it. I understand the reasons for applications having their own copy of the code like this but think there's equally good reasons why they should use a common library installed on the computer, maybe as an option. Right now, I have to rely on Revolution updating their code to solve my problems whereas with a common library approach, I could download and compile as several people have suggested and not have to rely on Revolution.
I'd say this depends on the type of application: if an application uses sqlite for it's internal data management, but none of the SQL functionality is exposed to the user, then there are good reasons to include a private copy: the app might rely on certain features not available in older sqlite distributions which may exist on the deployment systems, or it might even have added some extension to sqlite which it relies on, etc. However, for applications that expose the SQL functionality (like phpperl modules, Revolution, SQL editors, etc.), it does make sense to use a shared library, which allows the user to update the SQLite implementation without having to wait for an application update.
Sqlite 3.13 With Icu For Mac Download
The Perl SQlite module, DBD::SQLite comes with its own built-in sqlite. Initially, I thought that was going to be problematic, but have come to like it that way.
Everything in one package. I screwed up my shared library once while experimenting with some funky build options, but my applications dependent on DBD::SQLite kept humming. As usually: 'it depends.' ;-) Exactly. my €.02sqlite-users mailing list - Puneet Kishor Carbon Model Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation Science Commons Fellow, Nelson Institute, UW-Madison - Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States sqlite-users mailing list.